The property decision
Before deciding
what comes down,
find out what you have.
An old kitchen is easy to dislike. A good position on the land is harder to replace. A buyer standing in a dated house has to judge both, often before there is a complete picture of the structure, the records or the work required.
Renovation and replacement should be compared against the same brief. If one proposal includes the garden, systems and a new pool house while the other stops at the kitchen, the totals will answer different questions.
The first appointment
Walk the house
with the team.
In Home 2.0, Scott Hobbs recommends bringing a knowledgeable contractor through a property to discuss what a renovation would involve. He also makes room for different professional opinions and different ideas.1
That early walk is useful, but it is not a complete condition assessment. Ask what can be observed, what the records establish and what remains concealed. An architect, engineer or other specialist may need to investigate further before an option can be priced with confidence.
What the records can change
Existing does not
mean replaceable.
A building, use or location on the site may have a particular approval history. The podcast discussion points to existing entitlements as something to investigate before demolition. Whether a particular right survives alteration or replacement is a question for the relevant authority and qualified advisers, not an assumption to make from the age of the house.
Ask for a written account of what is lawful now, what the proposed work changes and which reviews are required. A broker’s description, a tax record and an approved use are not interchangeable pieces of evidence.
Jurisdiction matters. Southampton Town publishes separate application checklists for interior work, additions, partial demolition and new dwellings, alongside other reviews. That list demonstrates why “renovation” alone does not describe the approval route. An incorporated village or a different town may have its own requirements.2
Compare the same finished brief
What renovation
asks you to keep.
Identify the parts with a reason to remain: a useful structure, a room with good proportions, a meaningful detail or a location whose status has been confirmed. Then identify the compromises. Can the desired ceiling heights, circulation and equipment routes fit?
Price the work needed to retain those elements as well as the work added around them. Temporary support, selective demolition, protection and reinstatement can be substantial parts of a renovation. Retaining something should be a considered decision, rather than an unexamined line in the estimate.
What replacement
asks you to start.
A new house can give the team more freedom to reorganize the plan and coordinate the structure and systems. It also creates a complete new scope, including demolition, site preparation and the approvals that apply to that proposal.
The comparison needs the whole result: design, engineering, building work, utilities, landscape, owner purchases and temporary arrangements. Keep allowances and unknown conditions visible in both options. Ask what information would most improve the reliability of each estimate.
The floodplain can change the calculation.
For a property subject to floodplain requirements, have the local floodplain administrator review the proposed work early. FEMA’s guidance describes substantial-improvement determinations that compare the cost of work with the market value of the building, excluding land. A substantial improvement can trigger compliance requirements for an existing building.3
That is not a calculation to make from the sale price of a valuable waterfront lot. Ask how the building will be valued, which costs are included and whether local cumulative or stricter rules apply. Keeping a portion of the house does not by itself settle the issue.
Make a calendar with reasons.
The podcast includes examples of renovation and new-build approval durations. They are historical observations, not a current schedule for another address. Ask for the actual sequence: investigation, design, submissions, decisions, procurement and construction.
Some work can proceed together; other work must wait for an answer. A useful schedule names those dependencies and the owner decisions that affect them. It also distinguishes a preferred summer move-in from a date supported by the scope and approvals.
At the next meeting, ask the team to identify the unanswered question most likely to change the recommendation. It might be structural, regulatory or simply a conflict in the brief. Resolving that question is a better next step than choosing a route because the first estimate looks tidy.
Builders, since 1954.
More About Hobbs
Hobbs, Inc. has been building and renovating homes since 1954. The Journal draws on that work and on conversations with architects and craftspeople about the decisions behind a finished home.
Discover HobbsSources and conversation
For a closer look
- Hobbs Conversations: Renovating in the Hamptons
Home 2.0, at 9:05 to 9:32 and 18:35 to 20:51. The timing remarks are historical, not current promises.
- Southampton Town: Building Applications and Forms
Examples of distinct application routes. Confirm the authority and requirements for the actual property.
- FEMA: Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage Desk Reference
How floodplain improvement determinations consider building value and proposed work.
A few practical questions
Is renovating always cheaper than rebuilding?
Renovating is not always cheaper. The existing conditions, retained construction, desired result and approval requirements all affect the comparison. Price both options against the same brief.
Does keeping part of a house preserve all existing rights?
Do not assume that it does. Establish the approval history and ask the relevant authority and qualified advisers how the proposed scope affects it.
Can I use a published permit timeline to plan my move?
Use a property-specific schedule. The jurisdiction, required reviews, design development and procurement all affect the sequence.
Continue reading
More from the Journal
The JournalWhat a Home Addition Costs, and What Drives It
Read the story →
The JournalBuy the Design First
Read the story →
The JournalHow 125 Employees Become 2,000 People on a Jobsite
Read the story →
The JournalRenovating a New York Apartment or Co-op to a Custom Standard
Read the story →
The JournalBuilding on the Water: Rain That Comes In Sideways
Read the story →
The JournalDesigning a Hamptons House for Light, Landscape, and Privacy
Read the story →
The JournalA Gut Renovation in New York, Done to a Custom Standard
Read the story →
The JournalWhat a Staircase Actually Costs, and Why
Read the story →
The JournalThe Things You Only Notice If You Live There
Read the story →
The JournalThe Real Reason Custom Homes Cost More
Read the story →
The JournalA Kitchen Renovation, Built Like the Rest of the House
Read the story →
The JournalZones, Radiant, and Air: A Custom Home’s Mechanical Systems
Read the story →The JournalAdding Out: The Home Addition
Read the story →
The JournalNYC Townhouse and Brownstone Renovation
Read the story →
The JournalSpeculative vs. Fully Custom Windows
Read the story →
The JournalThe Pool House, Built to the Standard of the Main House
Read the story →
The JournalCoordinating Before Construction
Read the story →
The JournalWhat a Custom Home Costs, and Where the Money Goes
Read the story →The Hobbs Journal
New stories, by email.
Writing on architecture, materials and the work of building a home. Subscribe for new Journal articles and conversations from Hobbs.